SciDoc Publishers | Open Access | Science Journals | Media Partners


International Journal of Forensic Science & Pathology (IJFP)  /  IJFP-2332-287X-08-101

Reverse Aqua Regia: A New Method Of Extraction For Diatoms From Human Tissue


Surender Kumar Pal1*, Arun Sharma2, Vinita Kumari3

1 Assistant Director, Biology & Serology Division, Regional Forensic Science Laboratory, Northern Range, Dharamshala, Himachal Pradesh, India.
2 Director, Directorate of Forensics Services, Himachal Pradesh, India.
3 Intern, DNA Division, State Forensic Science Laboratory, Himachal Pradesh, India.


*Corresponding Author

Surender Kumar Pal,
Surender Kumar Pal, Assistant Director, Biology & Serology Division, Regional Forensic Science Laboratory, Northern Range, Dharamshala, Himachal Pradesh, India.
E-mail: skpal1969@gmail.com

Received: February 13, 2021; Accepted: February 17, 2021; Published: February 27, 2021

Citation: Surender Kumar Pal, Arun Sharma, Vinita Kumari. Reverse Aqua Regia: A New Method Of Extraction Of Diatoms From Human Tissue. Int J Forensic Sci Pathol. 2021;08(01):425-429. doi: dx.doi.org/10.19070/2332-287X-2100090

Copyright: Surender Kumar Pal©2021. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.



Abstract

Background: The presence of diatoms in human tissues contributes significantly in determining the mode of death in drowning. Conventional acid digestion of tissues for extraction of diatoms is a time consuming and potentially hazardous technique. The various techniques of extraction and analys is affect the identification of diatoms from human tissues. We have developed and tested a new method which is a simple, safe, time saving and economical extraction technique and extracts diatoms rapidly by removing the extracellular and intracellular organic matter from the siliceous frustules of diatoms. The method was compared with other conventional methods of extraction. This method provides results within 2-3 hours from the tissue samples of suspected drowning cases without interfering with microscopic observation and may be useful in current forensic practices.
Materials and methods: The lung tissue samples and bone marrow from bones (femur and sternum) of 66 human cases suspected for drowning death were taken. The human tissue samples of humans were analyzed by the modified reverse aqua regia digestion method and the conventional acid digestion method simultaneously.
Results: The results showed that the modified reverse aqua regia digestion method was less time consuming having very strong digestive ability with less impurity as the structure of diatoms remained almost intact, diatoms were identified with clear striations and the recovery rate was higher as compared to conventional acid digestion method.
Conclusion: The modified reverse aqua regia acid digestion method is a new scientific approach in the field of forensic diatomology as this is simple and rapid procedure that produces more effective results.



1.Abstract
2.Keywords
3.Introduction
4.MaterialS and Methods
5.Results
6.Discussion
7.Conclusion
8.References


Keywords

Drowning; Diatom Test; Digestion Method; Diatom Extraction; Modified Reverse Aqua Regia; N: Number; WHO: World Health Organization; NCRB: National Crime Record Bureau; DNA: Deoxyribonucleic Acid; PCR: Polymerase Chain Reaction; SEM: Scanning Electron Microscope.


Introduction

Drowning is the most common cause of mortality in India. The establishment of ante-mortem or post-mortem submersion in unnatural deaths plays an important role in investigation of crime cases. Nearly, every hour 42 people and every year, 3.7 lakh people die due to drowning worldwide. Drowning is the third major cause of accidental deaths worldwide [1]. According to National Crime Record Bureau (NCRB) report 2018, drowning was the third major cause of all accidental deaths reported inIndia [2]. Diatoms are microscopic, unicellular, photosynthetic algal organisms with a diameter of between 2 and 200 microns, although sometimes they can be up to 2 millimeters long. Their uniqueness lies in the hardened silica cell wall (SiO2) which is resistant to decay and retains diagnostic features enabling species identification and comparison. Diatom is a large group of algae which consists of over 200 genera and 10,000 species, out of which 92 genera and 569 species are reported in India [3]. According to Mann and Droop, there are hundreds of genera and perhaps 20,000 species of diatoms of which only a tenth have been described so far [4]. Diatoms occur in almost every type of habitat, but some species have a narrow range of distribution due to preferable mode of habitat and thus they can be used for biomonitoring [5]. Diatoms have different environmental preferences based on pH, light, temperature, moisture condition, salinity, oxygen, organic and inorganic nutrients, thus the species of diatoms vary from one drowning medium to another [6, 7]. It helps to determine the site of drowning by comparing the diatoms species present in tissue samples and water samples of the drowning site [8].

The identification of diatoms in the body tissues to prove death by drowning dates back to the end of the 19th century. In the case of ante-mortem drowning, the water enters into the lungs and then into the bloodstream through ruptures in the peripheral alveoli before being carried to the other organs due to inhalation. The microscopic contents including diatoms present in the drowning medium enter into the blood. The detection of these diatoms is done by using diatom test to ascertain the cause of death. The diatom test is based on the diatom density in the drowning medium and the extreme locations of human body including femur, sternum bone, liver, kidney and brain as several diatoms have passed to these locations from the lungs through blood [9, 10]. The extraction of diatoms from the various tissue samples requires the acid digestion. Therefore, the criteria used for the diatom test is based on the time required for samples digestion, the digestive capability of the method used, reclamation of diatoms after digestion, extraction and destruction of diatom frustules [11].

Due to advancement in the molecular methods in recent years, DNA sequencing has been used in diatom testing of drowning cases [8]. Racz et al. used a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based method to identify phytoplankton such as cyanobacteria, green algae, etc [12]. Vinayak and Gautam used DNA barcoding to identify diatom species by using short standardized DNA region [13]. Chen et al. classified a supplementary method of classifying the single diatom cells by using the V4 region of 18S rDNA [14]. DNA based techniques are effective in identifying the diatom species than other morphological based methods. However, the use of DNA sequencing in forensic cases is limited asthese methods require expensive reagents and instruments which may not be available in forensics laboratories. Zhao et al. developed Microwave-Vacuum Filtration-Automated Scanning Electron Microscopy (MD-VF-Auto SEM) method. In this method, the SEM system automatically scans filter fields from the vacuum and takes pictures of the fields for quantitative and qualitative analysis. The limitation of this method is that the microwave digestion device and electron microscope are not commonly available in conventional forensic laboratories [15]. Some earlier studies conducted on the diatom test directly utilized tissue samples for microscopic examination, but with the intervention of new technologies; the diatom test has also been standardized. However, several methods for digestion of human tissues have been presented in the literature, but they have some limitations. The commonly used method is the acid digestion test using nitric acid which is still widely used for the detection of diatoms. The conventional acid digestion method is a laborious, hazardous and time consuming. The integrity of diatom structure is destroyed due to the harsh nature of the chemicals used in this method. The retrieval of literature showed that there is no study having such a large sample of human tissue digestion by modified reverse aqua regia till date. The new method is advancement in forensic diatom tests for identification and classification of diatoms.


Material and Methods

This study was conducted on samples of 66 cases of drowning deaths received for examination at Regional Forensic Science Laboratory (RFSL) from January 2016 to December 2018. The diatom extraction of the samples was done by using the conventional acid digestion method and newly developed, tested and validated modified reverse aqua regia digestion method. In case of conventional acid digestion method, the material was extracted from the human lung tissues and bone marrow samples. 50 ml. of nitric acid was added to the beaker containing extracted material and kept for simmering on a hot plate at 60-700C for 48 hours in a fume hood. The material extracted was centrifuged thrice at 4000 rpm for 10 minutes and washed with double distilled water and finally with ethanol. The acid-resistant extracted material was isolated and control water samples were spread on a glass slide, dried in an oven, and examined microscopically.

The modified reverse aqua regia digestion method which was developed at RFSL, Northern Range, Dharamshala, Himachal Pradesh, India. The diatom extraction was done from lung tissue samples and bone marrow. The bones (femur and sternum) were cut using a clean band saw and the bone marrow was scooped out by using a spatula. The lung tissue samples and bone marrow were digested by mixing 15 ml of analytical grade concentrated HNO3 and 5 ml of HCl in a ratio 3:1 in 5-10 g of tissue samples (lungs and bone marrow), placed into a boiling flask and kept on the hot plate for simmering at 60-700C without interruption approximately for two hours in an acid digestion block. The fat layer of organic matter was removed and the suspension was taken in to a test tube for centrifugation. The extracted samples were centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 15 minutes. The supernatant was removed and the deposit retained was washed twice with distilled water using centrifugation and finally twice with ethanol. The distilled water removes the extra residual particles and ethanol increases the clarity in the anatomical structure of diatoms. The supernatant was discarded and the residues were transferred on a clean glass slide by using a disposable micropipette, dried in an oven and examined under a microscope at a magnification of 400 as shown in figure 1.


Figure 1: Protocol of modified aqua regia method.


After microscopic observation of both samples of conventional and modified reverse aqua regia method, intra and inter comparison was done between the diatoms present in the digested material extracted from a biological specimen. The qualitative, quantitative, and morphological aspects of every sample of diatoms were recorded to study the utility and validity of both the diatom extraction methods. A comparison was done between both the methods. Validation of new digestive method was done by inter laboratory comparisonand similar results were obtained.


Results

In the present study, on comparing both the digestion methods, it was found that the newly developed method was less time consuming having higher digestive capability and higher recovery of diatoms with clear morphological features, where as conventional method took more time, affected the siliceous cell wall of diatoms and gave poor results in identification. The new method for detecting diatoms in human tissues took about 2-3 hours for analysis where as conventional method took at least 48 hours. The integrity of diatom structure was not disturbed as it remained intact after the digestion process with a clear background with less impurity as shown in figure 2.


Figure 2: Microscopic images of diatoms under 400x and comparison of residues by using conventional acid digestion method and modified reverse aqua regia digestion method.


There was no or minimal loss of diatoms in this new method. The modified reverse aqua regia is a corrosive mixture of 3 parts of HNO3 + 1 part of HCl by volumes of concentrated reagents. Nitric acid is an excellent oxidizing agent which allows the organic matter digested faster. When nitric acid and hydrochloric acid are mixed, the chemical reaction that ensued was as:

3HNO3 + HCl ? [H2 ((N3O9) Cl)) ]

2H2 + N3O9Cl


Discussion

Some modified strong acid digestion methods are in use in forensic procedures. The modified reverse aqua regia method is a quick, simple and economical technique of diatom extraction and detection from human bone marrow and tissues samples. The digestive ability of the modified reverse aqua regia method was very strong as the structure of diatoms remained almost intact and showed clear diatom identification. In this newly developed method, remarkable collection showing morphological and anatomical features of diatoms of different genera were seen. These results showed that the modified reverse aqua regia could detect sufficient numbers and types of diatoms in small samples even. The conventional method of acid digestion is time-consuming and laborious method. It destroys the integrity of the diatom structure, thus often leading to false negative results. The conventional forensic diatom tests are not a useful tool to provide accurate information about diatoms. The results of our study were in line with the results of Wang et al. whotested lefort aqua regia method on animal tissue samples and showed that the lefort aqua regia digestion method had a superior digestive ability with higher recovery rate and less damage than the conventional acid digestion method. In thestudy of Wand et al., they used 15ml of concentrated HNO3 with 5ml of concentrated HCl added in succession, then 2ml of H2O2 was dripping in the solution at the rate of 1 drop per 3 sec. The samples were left undisturbed for 15 minutes and then were put into the thermostatic water tank at 85°C for 50 minutes, and during heating, another 3 mL of H2O2 was added at the rate of 1 drop per 3 seconds [16]. Fucci developed a method by taking 30% H2SO4 and then treated the samples with diluted solution which has an advantage over the classical method. The advantage of this method was that there was a decrease in the presence of destroyed diatoms fragments. The study showed that the classical acid digestion method used for the detection of diatoms was very aggressive and destroyed the diatoms frustules [17].

Modified reverse aqua regia method took veryless time in detecting diatoms present in human tissues than the previous techniques as the samples were analyzed within 2-3 hours. Take ichi and Kitamura in their study showed that formalin-fixed samples can also be used for the detection of diatoms by using enzymatic digestion method. The lungs samples were heated in 0.01 M Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.5) containing sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) with or without glycine, then the lungs samples were subjected to enzymatic digestion with proteinase K, after wards the samples were heated at 800C for 6-12 hour and then the samples were analyzed microscopically. They reported that the incubation of digested samples with this method was more appropriate for qualitative and quantitative analysis of diatom. The morphology of diatoms was preserved [18]. Kakizaki et al. used in expensive reagents such as papain, SDS, and 5 N HCl for extracting diatoms from lung, kidney, and liver tissues and extracted diatoms from tissue samples within 3-5 h.Kakizaki et al. also proposed that the digestion efficiency of papain is better than proteinase K [19].

In modified reverse aqua regia digestion method, the structures of diatoms remained almost intact with a high reclamation rate and were identified with clear striations as compared to the conventional method. Ming et al. in their study compared four digestive methods (nitric acid plus hydrogen peroxide, proteinase K, nitric acid in disorganization can and toluene-350) and showed that the structure of diatoms under the scanning electron microscope (SEM) remained perfect after digestion with proteinase K, but was found to be destructive to some extent in case ofnitric acid plus hydrogen peroxide, nitric acid in disorganization can and toluene-350 method. They showed that the diatoms extracted from the proteinase K method had a higher recovery rate and produced more satisfactory results with fewer samples and caused less pollution butthe proteinase K method is too expensive to use for diatom testing [20]. DiGiancamillo et al. used a new method with HCl to digest the pig tissues for diatom testing and compared the method to other chemical and enzymatic digestion methods such as H2O2+HCl, H2SO4+HNO3, Pronase+Pancreatine and Proteinase K+Pancreatineand reported that HCl method was a more simple, safe, inexpensive, less time consuming with minimal organic residue [21].

Kakizaki and Yukawa in their study proposed a new protocol (rapid enzymatic digestion method) for solubilizing lung tissue sample by using Qiagen proteinase K, Qiagen buffer ATL and 5N HCl within 3 hours. There is limitation in rapid enzymatic digestion method as this method can only be used for small samples of lung tissue, as diatoms are found in ample amount in lungs and not in enclosed organs such as kidney and liver. The numbers and variations in types of diatoms are low in such organs and the method is more expensive and impractical for routine testing in laboratories [22]. Ludes et al. treated organs samples with chemicaldigestion by using nitric acid, enzymatic digestion by using proteinase K and ashing method. Ludes et al. reported that enzymatic digestion method was the more rapid, safe and environment friendly but this method takes eight hours for digestion of liver, lung, kidney and brain samples [23]. The modified reverse aqua regia method was very economical, less time consuming and environment friendly as compared to other methods such as H2SO4, nitric acid, chemical and enzymatic digestion using nitric acid and proteinase K, enzymatic digestion with proteinase K, papain, HCl, rapid enzymatic digestion, nitric acid plus hydrogen peroxide, nitric acid in disorganization can and toluene-350 method. All these methods of diatom extraction had different methodology and were comparatively expensive.

In the present study, we detected 15-18 diatoms/100 µl of a pellet in 5-10 gm of lung samples and 30-35 diatoms from the bone marrow of femur and sternum bones. The diatom analysis was considered positive when the number of diatoms was above a minimal established limit i.e., 20 diatoms/100 µl of a pellet obtained from 10 gm of lung samples and 50 diatoms from other organs [24]. The presence of diatoms in lung tissues and bone marrow streng then the supportive evidence that the person was alive at the time of drowning. Further matching of diatoms from lung tissues and bone marrow strengthens this supportive evidence and a positive conclusion may be drawn whether the person was living or not when drowned. Ludeset al. reported that in cases of suspected drowning, 20 diatoms from a 10g of lung sample or five complete diatoms from other organs, including bone marrow are normally required for a positive diagnosis [25].


Conclusion

The modified reverse aqua regia acid digestion method is a simple and considerably fast standardized technique with a higher success rate of diatom extraction within 2-3 hours which may become the gold standard in forensic diatomology. The recovery rate of modified reverse aqua regia acid digestion method is superior to the conventional acid digestion method. The new procedure improves the stability and ensures the complete extraction of diatom from the sample and gives the best in sight into the identification of morphological features of diatoms.


References

  1. WHO global report on drowning: preventing a leading killer. 2014.
  2. Accidental deaths and suicides in India NCRB report. Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt. of India. 2018.
  3. Neelesh T. Diatoms: characteristics, occurrence and reproduction. 2020.
  4. Mann DG, Droop SJ. Biodiversity, biogeography and conservation of diatoms. InBiogeography of freshwater algae 1996. 19-32.
  5. Collins A, Ohandja DG, Hoare D, Voulvoulis N. Implementing the Water Framework Directive: a transition from established monitoring networks in England and Wales. Environmental Science & Policy. 2012 Mar 1;17:49-61.
  6. Vanelslander B, Créach V, Vanormelingen P, Ernst A, Chepurnov VA, et al. Ecological differentiation between sympatric pseudocryptic species in the estuarine benthic diatom Navicula phyllepta (Bacillariophyceae). J Phycology. 2009 Dec;45(6):1278-1289. Pubmed PMID/ 27032584.
  7. Van Dam H, Mertens A, Sinkeldam J. A coded checklist and ecological indicator values of freshwater diatoms from the Netherlands. Netherland Journal of Aquatic Ecology. 1994 Mar;28(1):117-33.
  8. Zhou Y, Cao Y, Huang J, Deng K, Ma K, et al. Research advances in forensic diatom testing. Forensic sciences research. 2020 Apr 2;5(2):98-105.
  9. Pollanen MS Forensic diatomology and drowning. Elsevier, Amsterdam 1998.
  10. Quantin S, Ludes B, North N, Coste M, Mangin P. Comparison of Two Extraction Methods of Diatoms Extractions from Organ Samples in the Diagnosis of Drowning. InActa Medicinæ Legalis Vol. XLIV 1994 1995 (pp. 277-279).
  11. Ming M, Meng X, Wang E. Evaluation of four digestive methods for extracting diatoms. Forensic science international. 2007 Jul 20;170(1):29-34.
  12. Rácz E, Könczöl F, Tóth D, Patonai Z, Porpáczy Z, et.al. PCR-based identification of drowning: four case reports. International journal of legal medicine. 2016 Sep;130(5):1303-7.
  13. Vinayak V, Gautam S. Diatoms: Fundamentals and Applications. Joseph Seckbach and Richard Gordon (eds.). Scrivener Publishing LLC; 2019 Aug; 435-470.
  14. Chen XG, Zhang J, Huang Y, Hou YP. Diatom taxa identification based on single-cell isolation and rDNA sequencing. Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series. 2013 Jan 1;4(1):e308-9.
  15. Zhao J, Liu C, Hu S, He S, Lu S. Microwave digestion- vacuum filtrationautomated scanning electron microscopy as a sensitive method for forensic diatom test. Int J Legal Med. 2013 March;127(2): 459-463. Pubmed PMID/ 22885954.
  16. Wang H, Liu Y, Zhao J, Hu S, Wang Y, et al. A simple digestion method with a Lefort aqua regia solution for diatom extraction. Journal of forensic sciences. 2015 Jan;60:S227-30.
  17. Fucci N. A new procedure for diatom extraction in the diagnosis of drowning. Clin Exp Pharmacol. 2012;2(2):1-2.
  18. Takeichi T, Kitamura O. Detection of diatom in formalin-fixed tissue by proteinase K digestion. Forensic science international. 2009 Sep 10;190(1- 3):19-23.
  19. Kakizaki E, Sonoda A, Shinkawa N, Yukawa N. A new enzymatic method for extracting diatoms from organs of suspected drowning cases using papain: Optimal digestion and first practical application. Forensic Sci Int. 2019Apr;297:204-216. Pubmed PMID/ 30831412.
  20. Ming M, Meng X, Wang E. Evaluation of four digestive methods for extracting diatoms. Forensic Sci Int. 2007Jul;170(1):29-34. Pubmed PMID/ 17010547.
  21. DiGiancamillo A, Domeneghini C, Gibelli D, Cattaneo C. Diatom extraction with HCl from animal tissues: a technical note. Legal medicine. 2011 Sep 1;13(5):268-71.
  22. Kakizaki E, Yukawa N. Simple protocol for extracting diatoms from lung tissues of suspected drowning cases within 3h: First practical application. Forensic Sci Int. 2015 Jun;251:179-185. Pubmed PMID/ 25911496.
  23. Ludes B, Quantin S, Coste M, Mangin P. Application of a simple enzymatic digestion method for diatom detection in the diagnosis of drowning in putrified corpses by diatom analysis. International journal of legal medicine. 1994 Jan;107(1):37-41.
  24. Ludes B, Coste M, Tracqui A, Mangin P. Continuous river monitoring of the diatoms in the diagnosis of drowning. J Forensic Sci. 1996 May;41(3):425- 428. Pubmed PMID/ 8656181.
  25. Ludes B, Coste M, North N, Doray S, Tracqui A, et al. Diatom analysis in victim’s tissues as an indicator of the site of drowning. International journal of legal medicine. 1999 Apr;112(3):163-6.

         Indexed in

pubhub  CGS  indexcoop  
j-gate  DOAJ  Google_Scholar_logo

       Total Visitors

SciDoc Counter

Get in Touch

SciDoc Publishers
16192 Coastal Highway
Lewes, Delaware 19958
Tel :+1-(302)-703-1005
Fax :+1-(302)-351-7355
Email: contact.scidoc@scidoc.org


porn