Role of Dermatoglyphics as a Diagnostic Tool in Syndromes and Systemic Disorders
M.P. Santhosh Kumar*
Reader, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Saveetha University, 162, Poonamallee High Road, Velappanchavadi, Chennai 600077 Tamil Nadu, India.
*Corresponding Author
Dr. M.P. Santhosh Kumar M.D.S.,
Reader, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Saveetha University,
162, Poonamallee High Road, Velappanchavadi, Chennai 600077 Tamil Nadu, India.
Tel: 9994892022
Email Id: santhoshsurgeon@gmail.com
Received: April 10, 2021; Accepted: April 29, 2021; Published: May 08, 2021
Citation: M.P. Santhosh Kumar. Role of Dermatoglyphics as a Diagnostic Tool in Syndromes and Systemic Disorders. Int J Dentistry Oral Sci. 2021;08(5):2390-2400.doi: dx.doi.org/10.19070/2377-8075-21000470
Copyright: M.P. Santhosh Kumar©2021. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Abstract
Dermatoglyphics is the art and science of the study of surface markings and patterns of ridges on the skin of the fingers, palm, toes and soles. It is a useful tool for investigations into conditions with a suspected genetic basis.Dermatoglyphic patterns on the fingers often differ in syndromes and other systemic conditions with a developmental component, compared to the general population. Current scenario of medical dermatoglyphics is such that the association between fingerprint patterns and various syndromes and systemic disorders such as Down’syndrome, Turner’s syndrome, Klinefelter’s syndrome, Trisomies 18, 13 and 8, Cri-du-chat Syndrome, Rubinstein-Taybi Syndrome, Cleft lip and palate, Leukemia, Rubella embryopathy, Congenital malformations of the hand and feet and many others has been well established. This article discusses in detail the applications of dermatoglyphics in diagnosing several syndromes and systemic disorders. Dermatoglyphics is an accessible, inexpensive, useful, reliable and noninvasive method of exploring the genetic associations of oral, craniofacial, systemic disorders and syndromes. Thus, apart from personal identification, dermatoglyphics serves as an excellent tool in screening population for several syndromes and systemic disorders.
2.Introduction
3.Dermatoglyphics As A Diagnostic Tool In Syndromes
4.Dermatoglyphics As A Diagnostic Tool In Syndromes.
5.Conclusion
6.References
Keywords
Dermatoglyphics; Finger Prints; Palm Prints; Plantar Study; Syndromes; Down’ Syndrome, Dentistry; Systemic
Disorders; Genetics; Medicine; Cleft Lip And Palate; Congenital Malformations.
Introduction
Dermatoglyphics is the science and art of the study of surface
markings/patterns of ridges on the skin of the fingers, palm, toes
and soles [1]. These dermal ridges over the palms and soles of an
individual are unique, universal, inimitable, classifiable, unaltered
and are formed by genetic regulation and control during early intrauterine
life [2].
The development of dermal ridges starts from 12th-13th week
of gestation and by around 20th week, well differentiated recognizable
dermal ridges are formed. Fingerprints are classified into
three basic types: whorls, loops and arches. As genetic or chromosomal
abnormalities might be reflected as alterations in dermal
ridges, they can be used as an easily accessible tool in the study of
genetically influenced diseases [3].
Dermatoglyphics has many applications in the field of medicine
and dentistry to predict several systemic, oral, dental, maxillofacial
disorders and syndromic conditions. This is due to the presence
of established association between fingerprint patterns; and various
syndromic conditions and systemic disorders such as Down’s
syndrome, Turner’s syndrome, Klinefelter’s syndrome, Trisomies
18, 13 and 8, Cri-du-chat Syndrome, Rubinstein-Taybi Syndrome,
Cleft lip and palate, Leukemia, Rubella embryopathy, Congenital
malformations of the hand and feet [4]. Dermatoglyphics are
considered as a window of congenital abnormalities and is known
to be one of the best available diagnostic tools in genetic disorders.
Dermatoglyphics As A Diagnostic Tool In Syndromes
Down’s Syndrome [Trisomy 21]
Holt, Uchida and Soltan have described the potential of dermatoglyphic findings in the clinical diagnosis of autosomal trisomies [5,
6]. Down’s syndrome [Trisomy 21 or mongolism] is a syndrome
of multiple congenital malformations caused by trisomy of chromosome
21 but about 6 percent of the patients show either a
translocation or a mosaic trisomy involving chromosome 21. Patients
exhibit flattened face with oblique palpebral fissures, flat occiput,
brachycephaly, smallnose, depressed nasal bridge, speckled
iris, epicanthal folds, a large furrowed tongue, short and narrow
palate, dysplastic ears, shorter neck, limbs and fingers, heart disease,
mental retardation, laxity of joint movement and hypotonia.
Cummins et al [7], and Walker et al, [8] demonstrated that dermal
configurations can be used for diagnosing down’s syndrome.
Walker et al [8] used indices in the form of histograms and logarithmic
scales to identify 70 percent of patients with down’s syndrome.
However due to complex analysis involved, this method
was not extensively used. Later Reed et al., [9] developed “Dermatoglyphic
nomogram” to diagnose down’s syndrome which was
based on four important areas: the right hallucal, right atd angle,
right and left index fingers.
Among the four important dermatoglyphic features considered
for Down’s syndrome patients, three (axial tri-radius, hallucal pattern,
and pattern on the second digit) were used in the nomogram
developed by Reed et al [9] and the fourth, the third interdigital
pattern, was used in the index created by Walker [10]. Among
these four patterns, the arch tibial pattern in the right hallucal area
and the distal displacement of the right axial tri-radius showed
significant differences between control group and the Down’s
syndrome group. In both the Caucasian and the Oriental populations
these features occurred with a very low frequency in the
normal controls.
Uchida et al demonstrated high frequency of arches in fingers and
toes among patients with 18 trisomy. About 50 percent of patients
exhibited simian creases and lack of loops and whorls. Patients
with D 1 trisomy have extreme distal displacement of axial triradius,
bilateral simian Creases,and "archfibular- S pattern" [10].
According to Cummins et al [7], a marked increase of ulnar loops
on all ten fingertips in both sexes is virtually a constant feature of
the dermatoglyphics in Down syndrome. Other dermatoglyphic
features are decrease of whorls, arches, radial loops, normal mean
a-b ridge count, low TFRC, and increased frequency of hypothenar
area patterns. A distally displaced axial triradius, frequently
associated with a hypothenar pattern, is a typical dermatoglyphic
trait in Down syndrome.
Characteristic dermatoglyphic features of Down syndrome are
Ulnar loops considerably increased in frequency, often found
on all ten fingertips; Radial loops shifted to fourth and fifth digits;
Large hypothenar patterns, predominantly of the ulnar type;
Distal axial triradius, high maximal atdangle; Thenar patterns decreased
in frequency, size and complexity; 13 patterns increased in
frequency; I4 patterns decreased in frequency; Transverse alignment
of main lines and ridges in the distal palm (high main-line
index); D line terminating in 12 area or even on the radial border
of the palm; I4 loop formed by a recurve of the C line; Absent
and abortive C lines increased in frequency; Single transverse palmar
creases increased in frequency; Simian lines increased in frequency;
Sydney lines increased in frequency; Single interphalangeal
crease on the fifth digit; Fibular loops increased in frequency
and whorls decreased in frequency in toes; Arch tibial configuration
in the hallucal area markedly increased in frequency; Distal
loops in the hallucal area mostly small; Distal loops in area IV
increased in frequency; Ridge dissociation; and Absence of Zygodactyloustriradii.
Unlike the palmar pattern intensity, the overall plantar pattern
intensity was decreased because of the reduced frequency of
patterns in all but the fourth interdigital area. In the fourth interdigital
plantar area, distal loops, and therefore the p" triradii,
occurred much more frequently in patients with Down syndrome.
The fifth digit is often incurved (clinodactyly) with an especially
short middle phalanx which is accompanied by a single digital
flexion crease on the palms. On the feet, there is increased space
between the first and second toes with a deep plantar furrow [11].
Dermal ridges on the palms and soles of patients with Down syndrome
are often badly formed, giving a characteristic appearance
of "dotted ridges" or "strings of pearls" (P lines). The degree of
ridge malformation varied greatly from very mild cases, with an
involvement of small palmar or plantar areas, to severe forms,
where most of the ridged skin showed these ill-formed patterns.
Utilizing only two dermatoglyphic traits that occurred with high
frequency in Down syndrome (transverse alignment of ridges in
the distal palmar area and large hypothenar patterns associated
with distally displaced axial triradius), Cummins and Platou were
able to diagnose correctly almost 90 percent of the individuals
determined to have Down syndrome by other clinical means [12].
A particularly simple and rapid test uses a dermatoglyphic nomogram
based on the four pattern areas that account for most of
the total dermatoglyphic variation between Down syndrome and
control subjects. In spite of the high degree of accuracy, dermatoglyphicanalysis
can only supplement and not replace more precise
means of diagnosis, such as karyotyping.
Trisomy 18
Patients with trisomy 18 have developmental and mental retardation,
Congenital heart defects, elongated skull with a prominent
occiput, malformed ears, narrow palatal arch, micrognathia, short
neck, short sternum, small pelvis, hypotonia, Inguinal or umbilical
hernia, renal malformations, cryptorchidism, flexion deformities
of the hands, retroflexible thumb, partial syndactyly of the fingers,
hypoplastic Finger and toe nails calcaneovalgus position of
feet and short big toe.
A strikingly high frequency of arches on the fingertips and a single
flexion crease on the fingers bilaterally, usually the fifth digit,
is characteristic of trisomy 18. Majority of the patients have a
simian crease, usually bilaterally. Characteristic Dermatoglyphic
features of trisomy 18 are: Arches considerably increased in
frequency; Radial loops on digits other than second, particularly
on the thumb; Decreased frequency of ulnar loops and whorls;
Radial exit of main-line A; Distal axial triradius; Increased atd
angle; I3 patterns decreased in frequency; I4 patterns decreased
in frequency; Ridge dissociation; Single transverse palmar crease
increased in frequency; Single flexion crease on the fifth digit;
Pattern intensity on soles extremely reduced and Hypoplasia or
absence of dermal ridges [13, 14].
Trisomy 13
Characteristic features of trisomy 13 include microcephaly, microphthalmos,
cleft lip and cleft palate, low-set and malformed ears, capillary hemangiomata, polydactyly, retroflexible thumbs,
long hyperconvex nails, and talipes equinovarus. Other clinical
findings include those frequently encountered also in trisomy 18
syndrome, such as developmental retardation, failure to thrive,
feeding difficulties, hypotonia, jitteriness and apneic spells, ocular
hypertelorism, strabismus, epicanthal folds, presumptive deafness,
micrognathia, short neck, extra skin on the nape, flexion deformity
of fingers, inguinal or umbilical hernia, congenital heart disease,
and undescended testes.
Characteristic dermatoglyphic features of trisomy 13 are: Arches
increased in frequency; Radial loops frequently on digits other
than the second; ulnar loops and whorls decreased in frequency;
13 patterns increased in frequency; I4 patterns decreased in frequency;
Axial triradius extremely distal; very wide atd angle; Thenar
patterns increased in frequency; Triradiusa displaced radially;
a-b ridge count increased; Radial exit of mainline A; Single transverse
flexion crease markedly increased in frequency; Arch fibular
and arch fibular S pattern frequent; and Ridge dissociation. Pattern
intensity was increased in palms and the intensity of plantar
patterns was greatly reduced [15, 16].
Trisomy 8 Mosaicism
Individuals with trisomy 8 mosaicism have psychomotor retardation;
an elongated and slender trunk with narrow shoulders and
pelvis; a large and prominent forehead; strabismus; agenesis of
the corpus callosum; abnormal nose; malformed ears; micrognathia;
short neck; restricted articular function; bone dysplasia,
extra ribs and vertebrae; hypertonicity; deep palmar and plantar
creases; nail dysplasia; absent patellae; heart defects; renal anomalies;
and frequent upper respiratory infections.
Characteristic Dermatoglyphic features of trisomy 8 mosaicism
are: Arches increased in frequency in fingertips; Whorls decreased
in frequency but often present on the same hand together with
arches; ulnar loops decreased in frequency; low TFRC; Thenar
patterns increased in frequency; Hypothenar patterns increased
in frequency; 12 patterns increased in frequency; 13 patterns increased
in frequency. I4 patterns increased in frequency; Single
transverse palmar crease increased in frequency; Arches on great
toes increased in frequency; Whorls in the hallucal area increased
in frequency; Plantar pattern intensity considerably increased; and
Deep furrows on palms and soles [17].
Pattern intensity on both the palms and the soles was very high
and the high plantar pattern intensity may be a characteristic feature
only of trisomy 8. In patients with trisomies 13, 18, and 21,
the pattern intensity on the soles was found to be markedly decreased.
Deep palmar and plantar skin furrows represent a distinct
feature of trisomy 8 [18].
Turner's Syndrome
Abnormalities of the sex chromosomes do not have as much influence
on ridge formation as do autosomal chromosomal aberrations.
Nevertheless, there are some noteworthy dermatoglyphic
features associated with sex chromosome defects.
Turner syndrome is caused by full or partial monosomy of an
X chromosome, with or without mosaicism. Characteristic features
in this syndrome are short stature, ptosis, epicanthal folds,
cataracts, and strabismus, depressed corners of the mouth, high
arched and narrow hard palate, micrognathia, malocclusion,
prominent ears, coarctation of the Aorta, low posterior hairline,
short metacarpal bones [particularly the fourth and fifth], narrow
fingernails and toenails, cubitus valgus, osteoporosis, multiple
pigmented, lack of pubertal sexual development, undeveloped
breasts, infantile external genitalia, primary amenorrhea, horseshoe
kidney, and multiple intestinal telangiectases. Palmar skin is
often very thin and wrinkled, and there is presence of prominent
palmar volar pads.
Characteristic dermatoglyphic features are: increseda-b ridge
count; increased TFRC; increased frequency of patterns in both
the third and fourth interdigital areas; increased hypothenar pattern,
distally displaced axial triradius, increased maximal atdangle,
full or a transitional single transverse crease in palms, missing
digital c triradius and a main-line A termination in the thenar area,
large whorls and large distal loops in the hallucal areas of the feet
[19].
Dallapiccolaet al. identified five dermatoglyphic characteristics
(TFRC, a-b ridge count, maximal atdangle, T line terminating in
the second interdigital area, and presence of hypothenar patterns
on the palms) and four skeletal characteristics (carpal sign, metacarpal
sign, phalangeal sign, and abnormally shaped distal phalanges),
to diagnose a patient with Turner’s syndrome [20].
Klinefelter's Syndrome
According to Cushman and Soltan, patients with 47, XXY
Klinefelter'ssyndrome exhibited significantly lower mean total
ridge count [21]. It is also been shown that the addition of X and
Y chromosomes progressively reduces the total ridge count.
47, XXY Klinefelter Syndrome: The clinical features of this syndrome
are frequent gynecomastia, sparse facial hair, female pubic
escutcheon, and disturbances of sexual function. Characteristic
dermatoglyphic features are lower TFRC, lower ulnar loop ridge
count, increased width of the ridges, increased frequency of arch
patterns on fingertips, reduced a-b ridge count, distal axial triradius,
and significant reduction of pattern intensity on the soles [21].
48, XXYY Klinefelter Syndrome: Patients with this syndrome
are taller, aggressive and mentally retarded. Dermatoglyphic features
are low TFRC, increased frequency of fingertip arches, distally
displaced axial triradius, and normal mean maximal atdangle.
It is considered that the presence of three hypothenar patternsloop
carpal, loop radial, and arch radial-associated with an ulnar
triradius to be characteristic of the XXYY variant of Klinefelter
syndrome [22].
48, XXXY; 49, XXXYY; 49, XXXXY Klinefelter Syndrome:
Characteristic features of this syndrome are poor development of
the external genitalia and more severe mental retardation. Dermatoglyphic
features are: increased arches on the fingertips, reduced
mean TFRC, Abortive C main lines, and ulnar triradius on the
palm, associated with a radial loop. A single transverse palmar
crease was a frequent finding in various variants of the Klinefelter
syndrome [23].
46, XX Klinefelter Syndrome: Males with this syndrome have small testes, small penis and scrotum, gynecomastia and lack of facial hair, and normal Intelligence. Dermatoglyphic features are:
increased frequency of fingertip arches, slightly decreased mean
TFRC, distally displaced triradii, and normal mean atdangle [24].
Polysomies of the Y Chromosome
47, XYY Syndrome: Patients with this syndrome exhibit muscle
weakness, poor coordination, mild mental retardation, normal
sexual development and are usually excessively tall. Characteristic
dermatoglyphic features are: low mean TFRC; normal mean atdangle;
distal displacement of the axial triradius; and decreased
frequency of the palmar patterns [25].
48, XYYY: Apart from low TFRC, no unusual dermatoglyphic
features have been noted in this condition [26].
Polysomies of the X Chromosome
Patients with this condition exhibit congenital anomalies, menstrual
disorders, amenorrhea, sterility, and mental retardation.
Characteristic dermatoglyphics features are lower mean TFRC
correlated with an increasing number of X chromosomes and abnormal
frequencies of the fingertip patterns [27].
Triploidy
Common features of individuals with chromosomal triploidy are
premature birth with very low birth weight, developmental retardation,
extremely low viability, cutaneous syndactyly of the third
and fourth fingers, coloboma of the iris, hypospadias, and testicular
germinal cell hypoplasia. Characteristic dermatologic features
are: presence of single transverse palmar crease, increased
frequency of whorls and decreased frequency of ulnar loops in
the fingertips, increased frequency of radial loops shifting from
their usual site on the second digit to the third, fourth, and fifth
digit and missing or fused digital triradii [28]. Butler et al., [29]
observed bilateral absence of distal flexion creases on the second,
third, and fourth digits and two unusually close proximal creases
on the fifth digits in a case of 69, XXX triploidy.
Cri-Du-Chat Syndrome
This syndrome occurs due to deletion of The Short Arm of Chromosome
5. The most characteristic feature of this syndrome is a
peculiar, high-pitched cry of infants resembling the mewing of
a kitten. The patients exhibit Low birth weight, failure to thrive,
respiratory stridor, laryngomalacia, profound mental retardation,
microcephaly, hypertelorism, strabismus, broad based nose,
oblique palpebral fissures, epicanthal folds, low-set ears, micrognathia.
premature greying of the hair, various skeletal anomalies,
and muscular hypotonia [30].
Characteristic dermatoglyphic features are: increase in frequency
of whorls; decrease in frequency of ulnar loops; Distal axial
triradius; increase of the maximal mean atdangle Thenar patterns
somewhat increased in frequency; Hypothenar patterns decreased
in Frequency; I4 patterns increased in frequency and patterns result
mostly from the D line; slight decrease in frequency of I3
patterns; Main-line C usually exits on the ulnar border of the
palm; Interdigital triradiusbc; and Single transverse flexion crease
increased in frequency. According to Warburton and Miller, unlike
controls, where the most frequent terminations of the C line
are in the third or fourth interdigital areas of the palms, the usual
termination of the C line in patients with the 5p- syndrome was
the ulnar border of the palm. Partial syndactyly of the fingers
or toes is relatively frequent among patients with the cri-du-chat
syndrome. In the hallucal area, an increased frequency of distally
oriented loops was observed, whereas whorls, tibial loops, and
arches were somewhat decreased in frequency [31].
Wolf-Hirschhorn Syndrome
This syndrome occurs due to deletion of The Short Arm of
Chromosome 4. Patients with this syndrome share many clinical
features in common with patients having the cri-du-chat syndrome
such as low birth weight, mental deficiency, growth retardation,
microcephaly, hypertelorism, strabismus, epicanthal folds,
a broad-based nose, micrognathia, muscular hypotonia, carp like
mouth, cleft or high-arched palate, beaky nose, preauricular dimple,
hypospadias, delay in ossification of pelvic and carpal bones,
seizures, deformed ears, sacral dimple, foot deformities, prominent
glabella, cryptorchidism, haemangioma of the forehead,
midline scalp defect, and coloboma of the iris or retina [32].
Characteristic Dermatoglyphic features of the 4p- syndrome are:
Arches significantly increased in frequency; decrease in frequency
of whorls and ulnar loops; low TFRC; Whorls significantly decreased
in frequency; Association of Wdl on thumb and A on the
second and third digits; Axial triradius somewhat distal (t'); Thenar
patterns somewhat increased in frequency; Hypothenar patterns
decreased in frequency; 13 patterns decreased in frequency;
I4 patterns increased in frequency; Single transverse flexion crease
increased in frequency; and Ridge dissociation [33].
According to Warburton there was an association of a double loop
on the thumb and arches on the second and third fingers in patients
with this syndrome. In contrast to the cri-du-chat syndrome
patients, the majority of patients with the Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome
showed an exit of main-line C in the 13 or 14 areas rather
than on the ulnar border of the palm.
Perhaps the most striking dermatoglyphic trait of the 4p- patients
is ridge dissociation [34]. The dermatoglyphics in both Wolf-
Hirschhorn syndrome and cri-du-chat syndrome showed an increase
of pattern frequency in the thenar and 14 areas, a decrease
of patterns in the hypothenar area, elevated axial triradii, and a
high proportion of palms with a simian crease. However, the frequency
of both single transverse palmar creases and distally displaced
axial triradii was much higher in the cri-du-chat syndrome
than in the Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome. Dermatoglyphic traits
that differentiate 4p- from 5p- include an increased frequency of
the fingertip arches, low TFRC, 'and ridge hypoplasia, whereas
a high frequency of the fourth interdigital loops resulting from
main-line D, and a high frequency of ulnar exits of main-line C
are seen in 5p- and not in 4p- syndrome.
Deletions of Chromosome 18
Deletion of The Short Arm of Chromosome 18 (18p-): The
patients have low birth weight, somatic growth retardation, Mental
retardation, hypertelorism, strabismus, epicanthal folds, ptosis
of the eyelids, flattened or broad nasal bridge, large ears, micrognathic
mandible, dental caries, webbing of the neck, lymphedema,
shield chest, hands are usually stubby with short fingers, and par tial syndactyly of the toes.
Characteristic Dermatoglyphic features of the different deletions
of chromosome 18 are: Whorls increased in frequency; Ulnar
loops, arches, radial loops decreased in frequency; higher TFRC;
Distal axial triradius; Thenar patterns decreased in frequency;
I3 patterns increased in frequency; decrease of 14 patterns; Hypothenar
patterns decreased in frequency; Missing ctriradius; and
Single transverse palmar crease increased in frequency. Plantar
dermatoglyphics revealed bilateral whorls in the hallucal areas and
bilateral fibular loops on the great toes of patients [35].
Deletion of The Long Arm of Chromosome 18 (L8q-): 18q
- syndrome is associated with characteristic clinical findings, such
as low birth weight, mild microcephaly, profound mental retardation,
retarded somatic growth, short stature, frequent hypotonia,
seizures, midfacial dysplasia, glaucoma, strabismus, nystagmus, tapetoretinal
degeneration, optic atrophy, short nose, mouth carp,
abnormal pinna, atresia of ear canals, conspicuous subacromial
dimples, long, tapering fingers, clubfoot, congenital heart defect,
hypoplastic genitalia.
The most striking dermatoglyphic features in this syndrome are
increase in the frequency of composite whorls on the fingertips,
decrease in frequency of arches, ulnar loops, and radial loops, elevated
Mean TFRC values, low mean a-b ridge count, increase
in the mean atdangle, distal displacement of axial triradii, usually
into the t' position, widened atdangle, increased pattern intensity
on the palms in the thenar, hypothenar areas and, especially, the
in the third interdigital area, and single transverse palmar creases
in palms [36].
Ring Chromosome 18 (18r): Patients with 18r syndrome exhibit
clinical features of both 18pand 18q - syndrome, such as low
birth weight, short stature, microcephaly, motor and mental retardation,
hypotonia, congenital heart defects, midfacial dysplasia,
strabismus, hypertelorism, epicanthus, ptosis, carp-shaped mouth,
micrognathia, anomalies of pinnae, ear canal stenosis, short neck,
and skeletal anomalies.
Dermatoglyphic features of 18r syndrome are: increase of whorls
on the fingertips, distally displaced axial triradii, increase in the
pattern frequency in the thenar/first interdigital area, and the
third interdigital area, and presence of a single transverse palmar
crease.
The hallucal area exhibited predominantly the loop distal pattern
and most of the great toes showed loop fibular pattern [37].
De Lange Syndrome
Individuals with the de Lange syndrome show mental and growth
retardation, low birth weight, generalized hirsutism, synophrys,
long eyelashes, anteverted nostrils, microcephaly, protruding
philtrum, thin lips, oligodactyly or peromelia, limitation in extension
of the elbows, proximally placed thumbs, clinodactyly of
fifth fingers, webbing of second and third toes, cardiac defects,
undescended testes, delayed eruption and wide spacing of teeth
[38].
Characteristic Dermatoglyphic features of the de Lange Syndrome
are: Radial loops increased in frequency, often found on
digits other than the second (particularly on the third); Whorls
markedly decreased in frequency; Distal axial Triradius; wider atd
angle; low TFRC; Thenar patterns increased in frequency; Interdigital
triradiusbe; 13 loops increased in frequency; Transverse or
oblique loop in the I4 area; True or transitional single transverse
palmar crease increased in Frequency; presence of simian crease
bilaterally; Single flexion crease occasionally present on the fifth
digit and presence of Ridge dissociation [39].
Rubinstein-Taybi Syndrome
The Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome includes developmental retardation,
broad terminal phalanges of thumbs and halluces, prominent
forehead, antimongoloid slant of the palpebral fissures,
strabismus, epicanthal folds, heavy or high-arched eyebrows, long
eyelashes, lid ptosis, abnormal ears and nose, broad nasal bridge,
high-arched palate, mild retrognathia, Grimacing, Clinodactyly of
the fifth fingers, overlapping toes, Angulation deformity of the
thumbs and halluces with abnormal shape of the proximal phalanx,
and duplicated distal or proximal phalanx of the hallux [40].
Characteristic Dermatoglyphic features of the Rubinstein- Taybi
syndrome are: Arches increased in frequency; Radial loops shifted
to fingers other than the second; ulnar loops and whorls decreased
in frequency; Additional apical triradius on the thumb or
great toe; Double patterns on the thumbs; Thenar/I1 patterns
increased in frequency, size, and complexity; Ulnar loop is a predominant
pattern in the hypothenar area; Distal axial triradius (and
therefore an increased maximal atdangle); 12 patterns increased in
frequency; l3 patterns increased in frequency; Missing c triradius;
Single transverse palmar crease increased in frequency; Distorted,
unusually long distal loop in hallucal area; distal loops increased
in frequency; Combination of two loops in the hallucal area; and
Deep plantar crease in the first interdigital plantar area [41].
Smith-Lemli-Opitz Syndrome
The characteristic features of the Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome
include moderate to severe mental retardation, growth retardation
of prenatal onset, microcephaly, ptosis of eyelids, inner epicanthal
folds, internal strabismus, short nose with broad nasal tip and
anteverted nostrils, increased nasolabial distance, broad maxillary
alveolar ridges, mild micrognathia, low-set ears, short neck, short
stature, narrow shoulders, cutaneous syndactyly of the second
and third toes, cryptorchidism, hypospadias, changes in muscle
tone, shrill cry, cleft palate or bifid uvula, metatarsus adductus,
deep sacral dimple, pyloric stenosis, and cardiac anomalies [42].
Characteristic dermatoglyphic features are: Decreased frequency
of ulnar loops; increased frequency of arches and whorls; Low
TFRC; Decreased frequency of patterns in the hypothenar, third,
and fourth interdigital areas in palm; increased frequency of thenar
patterns; distally displaced axial triradius; true or transitional
simian crease on the palm bilaterally; hypoplasia of dermal ridges;
and missing triradius c bilaterally [43].
Because ridge differentiation is closely associated with embryogenesis
of the limbs, the most obviously abnormal dermatoglyphics
can be expected to be found in individuals with congenitally
malformed hands and feet. All anomalous extremities show an
unusual epidermalridge arrangement with the magnitude of ridge
abnormality roughly proportional to the skeletal defects.
Thalidomide Embryopathy
Thalidomide is an agent which affects limb development. The
most striking dermatoglyphic findings in thalidomide damaged
infants were absence of the axial triradii accompanied by
transverse flow of the palmar ridges, shifted and doubled digital
triradii, abnormal course of the main lines, ridge dissociation, abnormal
palmar flexion creases, missing thenar crease and single
transverse creases [44].
Hypoplasia of The Thumbs
Absent or hypoplastic thumbs occur occasionally as isolated
anomalies but usually they are associated with other congenital
malformations and syndromes, such as Holt-Oram syndrome,
thalidomide embryopathy, Fanconi's anaemia, trisomy 18, and
ring-D chromosome. In this condition, the ridge configurations in
the proximal palm are distorted, the ridges run transversely across
the palm, and axial tri-radius and the thenar crease are missing.
Presence or absence of an extra digital tri-radius and the main
line originating from it indicates whether the triphalangeal thumb
is indeed a thumb or a duplicated index finger associated with
absence of the thumb [45].
Triphalangy of The Thumbs
The triphalangeal thumb is usually thin and finger-like and is frequently
displaced distally to the level of other digits. It is found in
conditions such as Holt-Oram syndrome, thalidomide embryopathy,
congenital hypoplastic anaemia, and trisomy 13. In this condition,
the epidermal ridges tend to be transversely aligned across
the palm, the axial Tri-radii are either absent or displaced distally
and radially and there is presence of single transverse palmar
creases. Radial loops, rarely found on digits other than the second
in normal individuals, have been reported on the triphalangeal
thumbs [46].
Holt-Oram Syndrome
Holt-Oram syndrome is a disorder consisting of skeletal anomalies
like hypoplastic, triphalangeal, missing thumbs, hypoplasia of
the radius or peromelia, hypoplasia of the clavicles and narrow
shoulders. This syndrome also manifests cardiovascular defects,
like atrial and ventricular septal defects. The characteristic dermatoglyphic
findings in this condition are axial triradii that are missing
or distally and radially shifted, a missing or rudimentary thenar
crease, and transversely oriented epidermal ridges on the palms,
increased whorls, decreased ulnar loops, and increased total finger
ridge count [TFRC]. Most of the palms of affected individuals
showed abnormal distal palmar creases, mostly a single transverse
crease in its full or transitional forms [47].
Anonychia
Anonychia is characterized by complete absence of the nail on
the index and middle fingers, presence of minute portions of the
thumbnail, a less diminished nail on the ring finger and normal
nail of the little finger. Anonychia can be associated with ectrodactyly,
syndactyly, or polydactyly. Anonychia on the toes parallels
the anonychia of corresponding fingers. With absence or hypoplasia
of the nails, the ridges extend over the dorsal area normally
covered by the nail. A similar extension of the ridges is found
in apical dystrophy (brachydactyly type B) and in the nail-patella
syndrome (onycho-osteodysplasia) [48].
Distal Phalangeal Hypoplasia
Hypoplasia of the distal phalanges is associated with brachydactyly,
onycho-osteodystrophy, pseudohypoparathyroidism (Albright
osteodystrophy), the hand-foot-uterus syndrome, and Sorsby syndrome
(macula coloboma and brachydactyly). A common dermatoglyphic
finding in patients with distal phalangeal hypoplasia is
a high proportion of arches on all fingertips and toes. Loops and
whorl patterns were either low or absent [49].
Brachydactyly
Brachydactyly is a condition characterized by reduced length
of the fingers and toes because of shortening of any of their
bony components, the metacarpals or phalanges. There are several
types of brachydactyly like type A, B, C, D and E. Penrose
and Holt have described the abnormal dermatoglyphic features
in patients with brachydactyly type A [50]. In the study by Hoefnagel
and Gerald, most of the patterns in the brachydactylous
individuals were arches, radial loops, low mean TFRC, high mean
atd angle and high mean a-b ridge count whereas ulnar loops were
markedly diminished in frequency and no whorls were found. On
the feet,the persons with brachydactyly showed an increased number
of whorls on the toes and tibial loops on the great toe [51]. An
increased frequency of fingertip arches was observed in a family
with the hand-foot-uterus syndrome by Halal et al [52]. On the
basis of dermatoglyphics alone, the researchers could distinguish
between the affected and unaffected individual.
Type B brachydactyly [ectrodactyly or apical dystrophy] in association
with syndactyly, is called as symbrachydactyly. The fingertip
patterns are displaced to the extreme end of the finger in concentric
circles, with no triradii. The broadened thumbs may have
an apical triradius at the tip, which is similar to the findings in the
Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome [53]. In the study by Degenhardt and
Geipel [54], there was an increase in both arches and whorls on
the fingertips, and decrease in the ulnar loops among the affected
members. In another study by Fuhrmann et al.,[55] an increased
number of fingertip whorls and a high TFRC were found in a
proband and his affected mother. Battle et at., [56] reported high
frequency of thenar/first interdigital patterns among patients
with broad or bifid thumbs, an association observed also in the
Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome. According to Robinson et al [57] in
Brachydactyly type C, there were four radial loops on fingers other
than the second (three on the third and one on the fourth) and
increased thenar/I patterns.
Pseudohypoparathyroidism
Pseudohypoparathyroidism (Albright osteodystrophy) resembles
brachydactyly type E. The characteristic dermatoglyphic features
in this condition are increased fingertip arches, and hypothenar
Patterns, presence of Distal axial tri-radii and the mean atdangle
of 55° [58].
Camptodactyly
Camptodactyly is a condition of permanent flexion of one or both interphalangeal joints.
Goodman et al reported that the affected siblings had many fingertip
whorls that extended distally on the terminal phalanges,
whereas the tri-radii of these whorls were on the middle or even
proximal portions of the digits. Characteristic dermatoglyphic
findings are increased TFRC, increased a-b ridge count, increased
atdangles, absence of digital creases over the permanently flexed
joints on the fingers and toes, multiple secondary creases on the
palms and soles and increased number of whorls on the toes of
the patients [59].
Syndactyly
Syndactyly can be found as an isolated congenital malformation
or as a part of another syndrome, such as Apert syndrome (acrocephalosyndactyly
type I), Carpenter syndrome (acrocephalopolysyndactyly),
de Lange syndrome, oculodentoosseous syndrome,
oral-facial-digital syndrome, and Smith-LemIi-Opitz syndrome.
The palmar area proximal to the webbing between the digits is
covered with transversely aligned ridges and an interdigital triradius
generally underlies the web. In cases of zygodactyly of the
third and fourth fingers, the usual triradii b and c are missing and
are replaced by an interdigital triradiusbc. The interdigital triradius
may be shifted distally in severe degrees of webbing. The fingertip
patterns vary with the degree of syndactyly. Because the interdigital
triradii indicate a close developmental relationship between
adjacent digits, presence of such a triradius can be considered as
a minor manifestation of zygodactyly [60].
Polydactyly
Extra digits on the hand or foot are associated with dermatoglyphic
aberrations. A well-developed supernumerary digit has its
own fingertip pattern and an imperfectly developed extra digit
or a digit joined to its neighbour has a pattern different from the
adjacent digit. A completely duplicated and separated extra digit
tends to have the same type of pattern as the digit it duplicates.
An extra digital tri-radius is generally found at the base of the
supernumerary digit and constitutes a significant feature of polydactyly
[61].
Because epidermal ridges reflect the embryonic development of
the hands and feet, such gross malformations of the distal parts
of the limbs as ectrodactyly or peromelia are accompanied by obvious
dermatoglyphic aberrations. The extent of dermatoglyphic
alterations can be great, depending on the severity of the hand
or foot malformations. Usual dermatoglyphic features, such as
digital triradii and interdigital patterns, may be so disturbed that
they cannot be identified. The lower limb malformations consist
of coexistent osseous syndactyly, polydactyly, and brachydactyly.
In spite of the abnormal epidermal configurations, ridge directions
conform to the anomalous moulding of the hand and foot structures [62, 63].
Dermatoglyphics generally do not play an important part in clinical
diagnosis of hand and foot abnormalities as these can be more
precisely identified by other means such as an x-ray examination.
However, understanding the relationship between embryonic
development and ridge formation is necessary for a meaningful
interpretation of the significance of dermatoglyphics in limb
malformations and these relationships may apply to other medical
disorders as well. Use of dermatoglyphics to diagnose hand
and foot malformations may reveal even minor abnormalities that
may otherwise escape attention.
Dermatoglyphics As A Diagnostic Tool In Systemic
Disorders.
Cleft Lip and Cleft Palate
Oral clefts are among the common congenital birth defects with
a broad phenotypic gamut. Since the epidermal ridges of the fingers
and palms as well as the facial structures like lip, alveolus,
and palate are formed from the same embryonic tissues during
the same embryonic period, the genetic and environmental factors
responsible forcausing cleft lip and palate might also affect
dermatoglyphic patterns.Hence,several studies weredone to compare
the dermatoglyphic pattern of children with orofacial clefts
and normal children and to determine the correlation of dermatoglyphics
with orofacial clefts.
Silver [64] investigated the fingertips, third interdigital area, and
hallucal patterns of cleft lip and palate patients and found no
significant difference in any dermatoglyphic configurations between
patients and controls. Silver [64] concluded that "cleft lip/
palate is a congenital anomaly whose developmental basis seems
to be independent of the production of aberrant dermatoglyphic
patterns," Similarly, de Bie and Matton [65] found no significant
differences in dermatoglyphic patterns between cleft lip/ palate
patients and controls. Adams and Niswander [66] studied only
the atdangle in patients with cleft lip, with or without cleft palate
(CL±P) and observed an increased asymmetry of atdangles in the
group of patients with familial CL -t- P. In the study by Wittwer
[67], several atypically located triradii, duplications of triradii, and
a tendency of the palmar main lines toward a vertical alignment
was noted among patients with cleft lip and palate.
In the study by Dziuba [68], the frequencies of thenar and first
interdigital area patterns were increased on the left palms in patients
of both sexes. Male patients exhibited low TFRC; increased
frequency of ulnar loops and arches; decreased frequency of
whorls. Female patients had a lower frequency of the patterns in
the fourth interdigital area of the left hand.
Piatkowska and Sokolowski compared dermatoglyphic features
of primary and secondary palate. They concluded that in primary
palate patients, a significant decrease of patterns in the fourth
interdigital area, particularly peripheral loops and in secondary
palate patients a significant decrease of tented loops in the third
interdigital area was found [69].
Neiswanger et al in their study did not find any significant pattern
count differences between cleft and non-cleft individuals,
but observed increased pattern dissimilarity in individuals with
clefts, compared to both their unaffected relatives and controls.
They concluded that increased dermatoglyphic pattern dissimilarity
in individuals with non-syndromic orofacial clefts may reflect a
generalized developmental instability [70]. According to Harika et
al significant difference was observed between parents with cleft
children and parents with at least 2 healthy children with reference
to pattern types; TRC and a-b ridge count and atd angle. Absence
of t point was variably noticed in the mothers of affected children [71]. According to Mayall et alno statistically significant difference
was found in the dermatoglyphic pattern and atd angle for both
cleft children and Non cleft children [72].
Saujanya et al conducted a study to determine the relative risk of
cleft lip and palate on the basis of lip prints and dermatoglyphics,
as genetic background may be useful for genetic counseling,
and the development of future preventive measures. 31 parents
of children with cleft lip/palate as a study group, and 31 parents
of unaffected children as control group were included. They
concluded that among the mothers of the study group, type O
followed by type IIa lip patterns were found to be significantly
higher in upper and lower lips, and in fathers type IIa followed
by type O were significantly higher. In the control group, type
IIb followed by type III were higher in both fathers and mothers.
Dermatoglyphic analysis of palm and finger prints revealed no
significant difference in the pattern types and total ridge counts,
but the Atd angle asymmetry was found to be significant between
study and control group [73]. Maheshwari et al reported that the
most frequently seen dermatoglyphic trait in the cleft and healthy
group was loops followed by whorls and arches. A highly significant
difference between loops in the cleft and healthy group and
statistically significant difference in the whorls were found [74].
Eslami et al investigated if Iranian individuals with nonfamilial
cleft lip and palate (CLP) and their unaffected parents displayed
more dermatoglyphic asymmetry than the normal population.
Results revealed no significant differences between the study and
control groups in terms of their asymmetry of atd angle, a-b ridge
count, and pattern dissimilarity score. However, significant differences
in mean TRC between CLP patients and control children
were found for the right ring digit, right little digit, and left index
digit. Also, there were significant differences among CLP patients
and control children as well as unaffected fathers of CLP patients
and their control group in terms of type of finger print pattern.
No enhanced fluctuating asymmetry was found in most of the
dermatoglyphic traits in the population studied, which indicated a
low degree of developmental instability of the sporadic cases of
cleft deformity [75]. Saxena et al compared the dermatoglyphic
patterns in subjects with clefts and controls and both their parents
to study the genetic etiology. Increased frequency of loops
and arches and low mean total ridge count was observed in cleft
subjects. Increased frequency of loops and arches with decreased
frequency of whorls, mean total ridge count, and atd angle of
right hand was found in parents of cleft group as compared with
the parents of the controls [76].
Mathew et al collected dermatoglyphic data from 50 oral cleft
children and 50 normal children and analysed. They found an increase
in the ulnar loop patterns on the distal phalanges of the ten
fingers, an increase in the atd angle and an increase in the fluctuating
asymmetry of the atd angle in the oral cleft children, which
indicates the degree of developmental instability of the oral cleft
individual [77]. Balgir evaluated dermatoglyphic characteristics of
sixty-nine cases of cleft lip with or without cleft palate and twenty-
eight isolated cleft palate cases for digital patterns, interdigital
patterns, palmar simian crease and sydney line, and model types
of C- and D-line terminations. Increased frequency of ulnar and
radial loops than the arches and whorls was observed in cleft lip
with or without cleft palate patients compared to controls. Interdigital
patterns were less frequent in cleft lip and cleft palate
patients. Simian crease and Sydney line were more common in
patients than in controls. Model types of C- and D-line terminations
showed variations in patients and controls. Wider 'atd' angle
and dermatoglyphic asymmetry were noted in the patient groups.
These findings suggested the dichotomy or heterogeneity of cleft
lip and cleft palate anomalies. Thus,dermatoglyphics can be used
as tool to study the developmental instability of cleft anomalies
and provides data to assess the genetic etiology of clefting [78].
Cerebral Gigantism
Cerebral gigantism is characterized by excessive length at birth,
rapid linear growth in the first years of life, advanced bone age,
large head, frontal bossing, prognathism, large hands and feet,
poor coordination, clumsiness, and mild mental retardation.Characteristic
dermatoglyphic features are: increased TFRC; both high
and normal a-b ridge count; decreased distance between palmar
triradii band c; increase in the mean ridge breadth; tendency toward
vertical or horizontal alignment of palmar ridges, increase
in unusual exit of main-line A in the thenar area; wide separation
of triradiia and b; Bilateral simian creases and lower main-line
index [79].
Rubella Embryopathy
Children affected showed a variety of severe congenital anomalies,
including microcephaly, cataracts, heart defects,mental retardation
and abnormal dermatoglyphics.
Achset al found an increased frequency of simian lines, distally
displaced axial triradii, and radial loops on other than second
digits in both rubella-damagedand rubella-exposed groups of
children [80]. Alter and Schulenberg observed several unusual
dermatoglyphic traits in patients with rubella embryopathy like
increased frequency of transitional andfull simian palmar creases,
an increased frequency of whorls on thefingertips [especially in
males], a decreased a-b ridge count, an increased atd angle, anda
tendency toward more patterns in the interdigital areas, thenar/
first interdigital area, and hypothenar area [81].
In the study on children with congenital rubella, the fingertip
whorlswere found to be significantly increased with a predominance
for females and increase in both simian and Sydney creases
[82]. In another study, only Sydney creases wereelevated among
adult patients with rubella embryopathy, whereasthe frequency of
simian creases was found to be normal. It was postulated that
the teratogenic effects of the rubella virus mayoverride otherwise
normal lateral differences of dermatoglyphictraits during development
and influence the patterns towards greatersymmetry [83].
According to PurvisSmith and Menser, an excess of whorls was
found in patients of both sexes [especially in males] than either
their mothers or fathers, and the high whorl frequency was attributed
to direct teratogenesis. The authors concluded that although
both genetic factors and theviral influence accounted for the very
high whorl frequency in rubella-affected individuals, the teratogenic
effect of the virus appeared to predominate [84].
Leukemia
Aleksandrowiczet al. reportedan increased frequency of fingertip
radial loops in males andof "radial whorls" in females with leukemia
[85].
Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia: Colombo et al. found whorls
to be decreased and ulnarloops to be increased in females [86].
Purvis-Smith and Menser found a higher frequency of whorls in
patients of both sexes and the fathers of the male patients and an
increase ofsingle transverse creases together with Sydney lines in
female patientsand their mothers [87]. However,in the Werteleckiet
al. series, the fathers and thebrothers both had a lower frequency
of whorls than the male patients.An increase of Sydney
lines withoutan increase of single transverse creases was observed
in severalinvestigated groups of patients [88]. In the Colombo et
al. study, the increasein frequency of the Sydney line was limited
to male patients [86].
Acute Myelogenous Leukemia: Rosner reported increased radial
loops on the right hand of malesand, in females, there was an
increased atdangle and a higher frequencyof hypothenar patterns
of the left palms [89].
Acute Leukemia (Not Otherwise Designated): Verbov reported
an increase of whorls and a decrease inulnar loops in the
males with acute leukemia [91]. Menser and PurvisSmithfound a
decreased frequency of ulnar loops and an increased frequency
of arches on the fingertips of male children.They also found an
increase of fingertipwhorls and a decrease of arches in female
children with acute leukemia [87].
Acute Blast Cell Leukemia: Menser and Purvis-Smith reported
an increase of arches, decrease of ulnar loops in the fingertips,
and significantly increased frequency of Sydney lines in patientswith
acute blast cell leukemia [91].
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Rosnerfound increased frequencies
of fingertip arches and hypothenar patterns on the right
palms, wider atdangles, and a decreased frequency of 14 patterns
among female patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia [89].
Aleksandrowiczet al.found an increase of the fingertip radial
loops in males andof the "radial whorls" in females [85]. Verbov
observed an increasedfrequency of radial loops and a decrease
of fingertip archesin males whereas females had an increased frequency
of fingertiparches [90].
Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia: An increased frequency of
whorls and a decreased frequency ofulnar loops on the fingertips
of the patients was reported by Rosner [89].
Cytomegalic Inclusion Disease
Wright et al. [92] and Purvis-Smith et al [93] found an increase in
the frequency of whorl patterns in infants with cytomegalic inclusion
disease and in their fathers. On the palms, simian line and
transitionaltransverse creases were found. It was concluded that
genetic factors controlling immune responses may beinherited
from the father and predispose a particular foetus to damagefrom
certain viral infections. Dermatoglyphic changes can be a sensitive
indicator of this damage.
Celiac Disease
Celiac disease is a disorder characterized by malabsorption, abnormalsmall
bowel structure, and intolerance to gluten. According
to David et al [94], dermatoglyphicchanges in adult patients
with celiac disease varied between moderate epidermal ridge atrophy
associatedwith the appearance of white lines and actual
loss of visibleridges and disappearance of white lines. Ridge atrophy
improved with a gluten-freediet and dermatoglyphicscould
be employed as an indicator of the patients' responseto the diet
therapy.In contrary, the studies by McCrae et al. [95] and Mylotte
et al [96] revealed no abnormal dermatoglyphics in patients with
celiac disease compared to controls and concluded that dermatoglyphics
cannot be utilized for diagnosing celiac disease. Although
the authors suggested that ridgeatrophy in an adult should alert
the possibility ofceliac sprue, they did not find dermatoglyphic
analysis to be a reliable method of monitoring the response of the
celiac patient to thegluten-restricted diet.
Conclusion
Dermatoglyphics definitely have a scientific basis for their role as
a genetic marker in various syndromic conditions and systemic
disorders. By understanding the relationship between medical disorders
and dermatoglyphic variations, it can serve as an excellent,
non-invasive tool in the diagnosis of several systemic conditions.
Dermatoglyphics is an accessible, inexpensive, useful, reliable and
noninvasive method of exploring the genetic associations of oral,
craniofacial, systemic disorders and syndromes. Thus, apart from
personal identification, dermatoglyphics serves as an excellent
tool in screening population for several syndromes and systemic
disorders.
References
- Cummins C, Midlo C. Fingerprints, palms and soles- finger prints, palms and soles: An introduction to dermatoglyphics. Philadelphia: Blakinston Company. 1943; 11-15.
- Galton F. Finger prints. London: Macmillan publishers. 1892;3-5.
- Campbell ED. Fingerprints and palmer Dermatoglyphics. E-fingerprints. net. 1998.
- Schaumann ?, Alter M. "Dermatoglyphics in Medical disorders." (1976): 1-258.
- HOLT SB. Finger-print patterns in mongolism. Annals of human genetics. 1963 Mar;27(3):279-82.
- Uchida IA, Soltan HC. Dermatoglyphics in medical genetics. Endocrine and genetic diseases of childhood. 1969:579-92.
- Cummins H. Dermatoglyphic stigmata in mongoloid imbeciles. The Anatomical Record. 1939 Apr;73(4):407-15.
- WALKER NF. The use of dermal configurations in the diagnosis of mongolism. J Pediatr. 1957 Jan;50(1):19-26. Pubmed PMID: 13377275.
- Reed TE, Borgaonkar DS, Conneally PM, Yu P, Nance WE, Christian JC. Dermatoglyphic nomogram for the diagnosis of Down's syndrome. J Pediatr. 1970 Dec;77(6):1024-32. Pubmed PMID: 4249677.
- UCHIDA IA, PATAU K, SMITH DW. Dermal patterns of 18 and D1 trisomics. Am J Hum Genet. 1962 Dec;14(4):345-52. Pubmed PMID: 13995080.
- Penrose LS. THE CREASES ON THE MINIMAL DIGIT IN MONGOLISM. The Lancet. 1931 Sep 12;218(5637):585-6.
- CUMMINS H, PLATOU RV. Mongolism; an objective early sign. South Med J. 1946 Dec;39(12):925-8. Pubmed PMID: 20274932.
- Penrose LS. Dermatoglyphics in trisomy 17 or 18. J Ment Defic Res. 1969 Mar;13(1):44-59. Pubmed PMID: 4238320.
- Ross LJ. Dermatoglyphic observations in a patient with trisomy 18. J Pediatr. 1968 Jun;72(6):862-3. Pubmed PMID: 5652615.
- Magenis RE, Hecht F, Milham S Jr. Trisomy 13 (D1) syndrome: studies on parental age, sex ratio, and survival. J Pediatr. 1968 Aug;73(2):222-8. Pubmed PMID: 5668372.>
- Taylor MB, Juberg RC, Jones B, Johnson WA. Chromosomal variability in the D1 trisomy syndrome. Three cases and review of the literature. Am J Dis Child. 1970 Oct;120(4):374-81. Pubmed PMID: 4250203.
- . Schaumann B. Dermatoglyphics in trisomy 8 mosaicism. Humangenetik. 1974;24(3):201-5. Pubmed PMID: 4442867.
- Tuncbilek E, Halicioglu C, Say B. Trisomy-8 syndrome. Humangenetik. 1974 Jun 26;23(1):23-9. Pubmed PMID: 4847188.
- HOLT SB, LINDSTEN J. DERMATOGLYPHIC ANOMALIES IN TURNER'S SYNDROME. Ann Hum Genet. 1964 Sep;28:87-100. Pubmed PMID: 14204855.
- Dallapiccola B, Bagni B, Pistocchi G. Dermatoglyphic and Skeletal Hand Abnormalities in Turner's Syndrome-A Tentative Scoring Method 1. Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research. 1972 Apr;21(1-2):69-78.
- Cushman CJ, Soltan HC. Dermatoglyphics in Klinefelter's syndrome (47,XXY). Hum Hered. 1969;19(6):641-53. Pubmed PMID: 5399260.
- Alter M, Gorlin R, Yunis J, Peagler F, Bruhl H. Dermatoglyphics in XXYY Klinefelter's syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 1966 Nov;18(6):507-13. Pubmed PMID: 5927873.
- FERGUSON-SMITH MA, JOHNSTON AW, HANDMAKER SD. Primary amentia and micro-orchidism associated with an XXXY sex-chromosome constitution. Lancet. 1960 Jul 23;2(7143):184-7. Pubmed PMID: 13822249.
- Nicolis GL, Hsu LY, Sabetghadam R, Kardon NB, Chernay PR, Mathur DP, et al. Klinefelter's syndrome in identical twins with the 46,XX chromosome constitution. Am J Med. 1972 Apr;52(4):482-91. Pubmed PMID: 5017243.
- Mavalwala J, Thompson H, Parker C, Wilson G. Sole dermatoglyphics of XYY patients. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1970 Jan;32(1):145-6. Pubmed PMID: 5415583.
- Schoepflin GS, Centerwall WR. 48,XYYY: a new syndrome? J Med Genet. 1972 Sep;9(3):356-60. Pubmed PMID: 4116771.
- Sokolowski J, Knaus A, Kleczkowska A. Dermatoglyphics of two cases of X tetrasomy. Am J Hum Genet. 1969 Nov;21(6):559-65. Pubmed PMID: 5365758.
- Penrose LS. Dermatoglyphs in human polyploidy. J Med Genet. 1968 Mar;5(1):1-3. Pubmed PMID: 5653863.
- . Butler LJ, Chantler C, France NE, Keith CG. A liveborn infant with complete triploidy (69,XXX). J Med Genet. 1969 Dec;6(4):413-21. Pubmed PMID: 4312483.
- Milunsky A, Chitham RG. The cri du chat syndrome. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research. 1966 Jun;10(2):153-7.
- WARBURTON D, Miller OJ. Dermatoglyphic features of patients with a partial short arm deletion of a B-group chromosome. Annals of Human Genetics. 1967 Nov;31(2):189-207.
- Leăo JC, Bargman GJ, Neu RL, Kajii T, Gardner LI. New syndrome associated with partial deletion of short arms of chromosome No. 4. Clinical manifestations of hypospadias, beaked nose, abnormal iris, hemangioma of forehead, seizures, and other anomalies. JAMA. 1967 Oct 30;202(5):434-7. Pubmed PMID: 6072506.
- Carter R, Baker E, Hayman D. Congenital malformations associated with a ring 4 chromosome. J Med Genet. 1969 Jun;6(2):224-7. Pubmed PMID: 5801472.
- Warburton D. Comments on dermatoglyphics. Birth Defects. 1969;5(3):123-4.
- Jacobsen P, Mikkelsen M. The 18p- syndrome. Report of two cases. Ann Genet. 1968 Dec;11(4):211-6. Pubmed PMID: 5306362.
- Mavalwala J, Wilson MG, Parker CE. The dermatoglyphics of the 18qsyndrome. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1970 May;32(3):443-9. Pubmed PMID: 5419379.
- Palmer CG, Fareed N, Merritt AD. Ring chromosome 18 in a patient with multiple anomalies. J Med Genet. 1967 Jun;4(2):117-23. Pubmed PMID: 5619991.
- Pearce PM, Pitt DB. Six cases of de Lange's syndrome; parental consanguinity in two. Med J Aust. 1967 Mar 11;1(10):502-6. Pubmed PMID: 6022911.
- Salazar FN. Dermatological manifestations of the Cornelia de Lange syndrome. Arch Dermatol. 1966 Jul;94(1):38-43. Pubmed PMID: 5939543.
- Filippi G. The Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome. Report of 7 cases. Clin Genet. 1972;3(5):303-18. Pubmed PMID: 4628491.
- Simpson NE, Brissenden JE. The Bubinstein-Taybi syndrome: familial and dermatoglyphic data. Am J Hum Genet. 1973 May;25(3):225-9. Pubmed PMID: 4704855.
- Fried K, Fraser WI. Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome in an adult. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research. 1972 Mar;16(1-2):30-4.
- SMITH DW, LEMLI L, OPITZ JM. A NEWLY RECOGNIZED SYNDROME OF MULTIPLE CONGENITAL ANOMALIES. J Pediatr. 1964 Feb;64:210-7. Pubmed PMID: 14119520.
- Giroux J, Miller JR. Dermatoglyphics of the broad thumb and great toe syndrome. Am J Dis Child. 1967 Feb;113(2):207-9. Pubmed PMID: 6019436.
- Hermann J. A familial dysmorphogenic syndrome of limb deformities, characteristic facial appearance and associated anomalies: The" pseudothalidomide" or" SC" syndrome. BD: OAS. 1969;5:81-9.
- Murphy S, Lubin B. Triphalangeal thumbs and congenital erythroid hypoplasia: report of a case with unusual features. J Pediatr. 1972 Nov;81(5):987- 9. Pubmed PMID: 5086730.
- Chang CH. Holt-oram syndrome. Radiology. 1967 Mar;88(3):479-83.
- Holt SB. The effect of absence of thumb on palmar dermatoglyphics. J Med Genet. 1972 Dec;9(4):448-50. Pubmed PMID: 4646554.
- Robinow M, Johnson GF. Dermatoglyphics in distal phalangeal hypoplasia. Am J Dis Child. 1972 Dec;124(6):860-3. Pubmed PMID: 4639222.
- Penrose LS, Holt SB. Note on dermatoglyphic data in a brachydactylous family. Ann Hum Genet. 1966 May;29(4):383-8. Pubmed PMID: 5961826.
- Hoefnagel D, Gerald PS. Hereditary brachydactyly. Ann Hum Genet. 1966 May;29(4):377-82. Pubmed PMID: 5961825.
- Halal F. The hand-foot-genital (hand-foot-uterus) syndrome: family report and update. Am J Med Genet. 1988 Jul;30(3):793-803. Pubmed PMID: 3189398.
- Freire-Maia N, Maia NA, Pacheco CN. Mohr-Wriedt (A2) brachydactyly: analysis of a large Brazilian kindred. Hum Hered. 1980;30(4):225-31. Pubmed PMID: 7390514.
- Degenhardt KH, Geipel G. Dominant erbliche Perodaktylien in 4 generationen einer Sippe. Z. menschl. Vererb.-u. Konstitutionslehre. 1954;32:227- 307.
- Fuhrmann W, Steffens C, Schwarz G, Wagner A. Dominant crbliche Brachydaktylie mit Gelenksaplasien. Humangenetik. 1965 Jan 1;1(4):337-53.
- Battle HI, Walker NF, Thompson MW. Mackinder's hereditary brachydactyly: phenotypic, radiological, dermatoglyphic and genetic observations in an Ontario family. Ann Hum Genet. 1973 Apr;36(4):415-24. Pubmed PMID: 4748760.
- Robinson GC, Wood BJ, Miller JR, Baillie J. Hereditary brachydactyly and hip disease. Unusual radiological and dermatoglyphic findings in a kindred. J Pediatr. 1968 Apr;72(4):539-43. Pubmed PMID: 5647298.
- FORBES AP. FINGERPRINTS AND PALM PRINTS (DERMATOGLYPHICS) AND PALMAR-FLEXION CREASES IN GONADAL DYSGENESIS, PSEUDOHYPOPARATHYROIDISM AND KLINEFELTER'S SYNDROME. N Engl J Med. 1964 Jun 11;270:1268-77. Pubmed PMID: 14133664.
- Goodman RM, Katznelson MB, Manor E. Camptodactyly: occurrence in two new genetic syndromes and its relationship to other syndromes. J Med Genet. 1972 Jun;9(2):203-12. Pubmed PMID: 5046631.
- Grebe H. Studies of papillary line changes in syndactyly and polydactyly. Journal of Morphology and Anthropology. 1940 Jan 1(H. 1):62-78.
- Cummins H, Sicomo J. PLANTAR EPIDERMAL CONFIGURATIONS IN LOW-GRADE SYNDACTYLISM (ZYGODACTYLY) OF. The Anatomical Record. 1923;25(6):355.
- Aase JM, Smith DW. Congenital anemia and triphalangeal thumbs: a new syndrome. J Pediatr. 1969 Mar;74(3):471-4. Pubmed PMID: 5764780.
- Elçioglu N, Atasu M, Cenani A. Dermatoglyphics in patients with Cenani- Lenz type syndactyly: studies in a new case. Am J Med Genet. 1997 Jun 27;70(4):341-5. Pubmed PMID: 9182770.
- Silver WE. Dermatoglyphics and cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate J. 1966 Oct;3:368-75. Pubmed PMID: 5222744.
- De Bie S, Hayashi M, Matton MT, Matton G, Vrijdagh S, Lejour M, et al. Dermatoglyphic analysis of primary and secondary cleft palate patients. Cleft Palate J. 1977 Jul;14(3):222-5. Pubmed PMID: 267521.
- Adams MS, Niswander JD. Developmental 'noise' and a congenital malformation. Genet Res. 1967 Dec;10(3):313-7. Pubmed PMID: 5587946.
- Wittwer B. Dermatoglyphics in cheilognathopalatoschisis. The Lancet. 1967 Sep 16;290(7516):617.
- Dziuba P. Badania nad dermatoglifami dloni i stóp u pacjentów z rozszczepam wargi górnej, wyrostka zebodolowego i podniebienia [Studies on palm and sole dermatoglyphics in patients with clefts of upper lip, alveolar process and palate]. Czas Stomatol. 1972 Dec;25(12):1195-200. Polish. Pubmed PMID: 4509459.
- Piatkowska E, Sokolowski J. Letter: Dermatoglyphs in primary and secondary cleft palate. Am J Hum Genet. 1973 Sep;25(5):575-6. Pubmed PMID: 4741851.
- Neiswanger K, Mukhopadhyay N, Rajagopalan S, Leslie EJ, Sanchez CA, Hecht JT, et al. Individuals with nonsyndromic orofacial clefts have increased asymmetry of fingerprint patterns. PLoS One. 2020 Mar 20;15(3):e0230534. Pubmed PMID: 32196525.
- Harika DJ, Sridevi E, Sai Sankar AJ, Pranitha K, Gosla SR, Kiran GB. Dermatoglyphic Analysis in Parents with Cleft Children: A Comparative Study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2018 Sep;9(Suppl 2):S291-S298. Pubmed PMID: 30294160.
- S Mayall S, Chaudhary S, Kaur H, Manuja N, Ravishankar T, A Sinha A. Comparison of Dermatoglyphic Pattern among Cleft and Noncleft Children: A Cross-sectional Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2017 Jul- Sep;10(3):245-249. Pubmed PMID: 29104383.
- Saujanya K, Prasad MG, Sushma B, Kumar JR, Reddy YS, Niranjani K. Cheiloscopy and dermatoglyphics as genetic markers in the transmission of cleft lip and palate: A case-control study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2016 Jan-Mar;34(1):48-54. Pubmed PMID: 26838148.
- Maheshwari N, Bansal K, Rao DJ, Chopra R. Comparison of dermatoglyphic traits and dental anomalies associated with cleft lip or cleft lip and palate patients with normal healthy children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2013 Oct-Dec;31(4):260-4. Pubmed PMID: 24262401.
- Eslami N, Jahanbin A, Ezzati A. Palm and finger print characteristics in nonfamilial cleft lip and palate patients and their parents. J Craniofac Surg. 2013 May;24(3):769-72. Pubmed PMID: 23714876.
- Saxena RS, David MP, Indira AP. Dermatoglyphic evaluation in subjects and parents of cleft lip with and without cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2013 Nov;50(6):e105-10. Pubmed PMID: 22906393.
- Mathew L, Hegde AM, Rai K. Dermatoglyphic peculiarities in children with oral clefts. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2005 Oct-Dec;23(4):179-82. Pubmed PMID: 16327138.
- Balgir RS. Dermatoglyphics in cleft lip and cleft palate anomalies. Indian Pediatr. 1993 Mar;30(3):341-6. Pubmed PMID: 8365784.
- Milunsky A, Cowie VA, Donoghue EC. Cerebral gigantism in childhood. A report of two cases and a review of the literature. Pediatrics. 1967 Sep;40(3):395-402. Pubmed PMID: 5298529.
- Achs R, Harper RG, Siegel M. Unusual dermatoglyphic findings associated with rubella embryopathy. N Engl J Med. 1966 Jan 20;274(3):148-50. Pubmed PMID: 5322927.
- Alter M, Schulenberg R. Dermatoglyphics in the rubella syndrome. JAMA. 1966 Aug 29;197(9):685-8. Pubmed PMID: 5952909.
- Hook EB, Achs RS, Harper R. An investigation of dermatoglyphic asymmetry in rubella embryopathy. Teratology. 1971 Nov;4(4):405-8. Pubmed PMID: 5116885.
- Purvis-Smith SG, Howard PR, Menser MA. Dermatoglyphic defects and rubella teratogenesis. JAMA. 1969 Sep 22;209(12):1865-8.
- Purvis-Smith SG, Menser MA. Dermatoglyphics in adults with congenital rubella. Lancet. 1968 Jul 20;2(7560):141-3. Pubmed PMID: 4173264.
- Aleksandrowicz J, Schiffer Z, Debski T. Dermatoglyphics in leukaemia. The Lancet. 1966 Dec 17;288(7477):1364.
- Colombo A, Gasparoni MC, Biscatti G, Severi F. Dermatoglifi e leucemia linfatica acuta nell'infanzia [Dermatoglyphics and acute lymphatic leukemia in childhood]. Minerva Pediatr. 1973 Mar 10;25(8):335-7. Italian. Pubmed PMID: 4515149.
- Purvis-Smith SG, Menser MA. Dermatoglyphics in children with acute leukaemia. Br Med J. 1973 Dec 15;4(5893):646-8. Pubmed PMID: 4519014.
- Wertelecki W, Plato CC, Fraumeni JF Jr. Dermatoglyphics in leukaemia. Lancet. 1969 Oct 11;2(7624):806-7. Pubmed PMID: 4186056.
- Rosner F. Dermatoglyphics of leukaemic children. Lancet. 1969 Aug 2;2(7614):272-3. Pubmed PMID: 4184135.
- Verbov JL. Dermatoglyphs in leukaemia. J Med Genet. 1970 Jun;7(2):125- 31. Pubmed PMID: 5519597.
- Menser MA, Purvis-Smith SG. Dermatoglyphics in leukaemia. Lancet. 1972 Apr 29;1(7757):956-7. Pubmed PMID: 4112118.
- Wright HT Jr, Parker CE, Mavalwala J. Unusual dermatoglyphic findings associated with cytomegalic inclusion disease of infancy. A first report and practical review. Calif Med. 1972 Mar;116(3):14-20. Pubmed PMID: 4335498.
- Purvis-Smith SG, Hayes K, Menser MA. Dermatoglyphics in children with prenatal cytomegalovirus infection. Lancet. 1972 Nov 4;2(7784):976-7. Pubmed PMID: 4116858.
- David TJ, Ajdukiewicz AB, Read AE. Dermal and epidermal ridge atrophy in celiac sprue. Gastroenterology. 1973 Apr;64(4):539-44. Pubmed PMID: 4700769.
- McCrae WM, Sandor G, Sangani AP, Stalker R. Fingerprint changes in coeliac disease. Br Med J. 1971 Jul 10;3(5766):109-10. Pubmed PMID: 5090799.
- Mylotte M, Egan-Mitchell B, Fottrell PF, McNicholl B, McCarthy CF. Fingerprints in patients with coeliac disease and their relatives. Br Med J. 1972 Oct 21;4(5833):144-6. Pubmed PMID: 5078446.